Transcript:
Dr. Robert Moynihan
At various times in human history, people have tried to refashion humanity. The Roman emperors demanded that they be worshiped and the Christians refused to bow or to offer incense to Caesar and they were persecuted for that, they were killed. The Soviet Union wanted to create a new man, Homo Sovieticus, the Soviet man who would no longer be part of a class society but would be a brother, a brotherhood of working men and women. But this society collapsed, just as the Roman Empire collapsed. And we saw it in our own lifetime, you grew up in the Soviet Union. Can you tell us anything about this attempt to create a new type of man and why it failed?
Bishop Athanasius Schneider
First, it failed because it was not based on the simple order of creation which God created. God is the inventor, He is in some way the architect of the universe, of human life and being which He gave a sense of order. When man will not observe the laws and its functions, it will collapse and will cease to work. When the Communists built a society with a completely materialistic view, which denies the immortality of the soul, it is against the nature of human beings. This will not work, we may consider it functioning for 70 years, but in the end, it will collapse. They even proclaimed The Eternal Soviet Union, Vechnyy Sovetskiy Soyuz, the eternal Communism and even so they did not believe in eternity. All other dictatorships such as Hitler, spoke about the Tausendjähriges Reich, the millennial reign and it collapsed after 12 years. So, it will occur when people will establish a society, just as the former Soviet Union, against the plan of God.
Dr. Robert Moynihan
While some people have a sense that we are at the present moment, experiencing one more version of this attempt to reshape and remake the human being. We call it perhaps globalism. But it’s a globalism based on tremendous computer power that can print tremendous memory of computer chips which can record every purchase that you’ve made in your life so they can decide if you like a doughnut or an egg, and they can get a profile of you over time. That then could be helpful in determining what you might be afraid of and what you might be attracted to. And in this way, with the increasing information society with these global straddling technological companies, the technocracy would seem to be merging the human person into some type of almost a global mind. Does this seem to be something that we should be concerned about?
Bishop Athanasius Schneider
Of course, all of us are witnessing this in our daily lives, this continuous control of our phones, which is also affecting our travels, with this new and forced mandated vaccinations. These are clear signs of control and through this, they can track us. So these signs are signifying that a person who is controlled is no longer free, substantially like a slave.
Dr. Robert Moynihan
When you mentioned tracking, are you saying this because you carry a card or a pass? Or are you saying there’s something in the vaccine itself?
Bishop Athanasius Schneider
I do not know but I believe you are marked. Marked in a sense that your specific numbers and the dates are already noted in the green pass or other passes. When you are traveling or perhaps going to supermarkets you have to show these passes and it is recorded of course.
Dr. Robert Moynihan
You say this is a sign of not being free or being a slave. But isn’t it merely a matter of being well-ordered and well-organized?
Bishop Athanasius Schneider
No, it is apparently well organized and it is well organized. It has to be well organized in order to keep together a slave society. If you’re not well organized, you cannot keep and control a massively enslaved society.
Dr. Robert Moynihan
But who then would be the controllers, and there’s a phrase in Latin, quis costodiet ipsos custodes, who guards the Guardians themselves? How can we be sure that the Masters as it were of this new, well-organized, orderly world, global society, are benevolent, wise, kind, and generous, rather than perhaps being malevolent, unkind, and actually exploiting the humanity that they have such total control over?
Bishop Athanasius Schneider
It would be completely naive to assume that those who make such a well-ordered control are benevolent. Because if you limit freedom, it is not benevolent, so much like the motto of the state of Massachusetts: live free or die.
Dr. Robert Moynihan
I think it’s in New Hampshire,
Bishop Athanasius Schneider
New Hampshire, excuse me.
I was there recently, this is when I am starting to control someone and it is not in itself benevolent because I am controlling. Children are a different matter because they do not have a sense of reason, we control children in order to protect them. I am controlling adult persons who have their own free will and intellect. Therefore, I am converting society in a benevolent way, the same way I control little children who know no reason or proper behavior, like slaves. But I’m more inclined that they would treat us like slaves with these beautiful expressions and protection.
